Data Integrity

Designing, assessing and improving data integrity across the full GxP lifecycle.

Data integrity sits at the heart of every GxP decision. If you cannot trust your data, you cannot trust your products, processes or reports.

Three business professionals, two women and one man, engaged in a conversation around an office desk with documents and a telephone.

We help life-sciences organisations design, assess and improve data integrity across the full data lifecycle, so you can rely on your information and stay inspection-ready.  Regulators such as MHRA, FDA, EMA and PIC/S now expect ALCOA+ and data-lifecycle thinking to be visibly embedded in your quality system, computerised systems and day-to-day operations.

Why Data Integrity Matters in GxP

In pharmaceuticals, biotech and medical devices, data integrity is not optional. It underpins product quality, patient safety and regulatory trust.

Done well, it helps you:
With Data Integrity

Ensure inspection-ready data

Records consistently meet ALCOA+ principles and stand up to regulatory scrutiny.

Reduce compliance risk
Gaps in controls, ownership and audit trails are identified and addressed before they become findings.

Strengthen process reliability

Data flows across systems are controlled, consistent and trusted for decision-making.

Improve lifecycle governance

Data is properly managed from creation through to archival and deletion, with clear roles and controls in place.

What We Do Under Portfolio Excellence

We combine ALCOA+, CSV/CSA and data-lifecycle thinking into a coherent set of services.

Step 1
ALCOA+-aligned data-integrity assessment

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.

structured data-integrity assessments for GxP-relevant systems and processes:

Data flows across the full lifecycle (creation, processing, storage, retrieval, archiving and deletion)

User access, roles and segregation of duties

Audit trails, logs and key system configurations

Interfaces and data transfers between systems

Use of electronic signatures and electronic records in regulated environments

Controls around system changes, upgrades and migrations

We can assess single systems or cross-cutting processes such as manufacturing, quality, maintenance or serialisation.

Step 2
Risk-based CSV / CSA

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.

Data-integrity risk is one of the core dimensions we use in CSV/CSA:

Classify systems, requirements and workflows by data-integrity risk Interviewing and running workshops with subject-matter experts and front-line teams

Tailor test depth and evidence to that risk

Integrate data-integrity checks into specifications, configuration and testing

Ensure validation deliverables support data integrity throughout the system lifecycle

This helps you focus effort where it genuinely reduces risk rather than where it only increases paperwork. 

Step 3
Data-lifecycle and process design

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.

Using a data-lifecycle model, we work with Data Owners, Process Owners and IT System Owners to map how GxP data is generated, processed and used. We THEN: 

Identify critical data, critical records and critical decision points

Define controls at each lifecycle stage, including manual steps

Align procedures, system configuration and training with those controls

Embed data-integrity thinking into day-to-day operations, not only into project documents

This joins up processes, systems and people so integrity is maintained in real work, not just in validation reports. 

Step 4
Remediation and improvement plans

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.

Where gaps are found – through internal reviews, projects or inspections – we help you: 

Prioritise issues by patient safety, product quality and data-integrity risk

Define pragmatic remediation plans that fit your operating reality

Update procedures, work instructions and governance models

Support implementation and revalidation where required

The focus is on grounded, sustainable improvement rather than one-off “paper fixes”.

Deliverables

Typical deliverables from a Process Modelling engagement include:

Data-integrity assessment report

Scope, methods, and findings across systems or processes, with gaps mapped to regulatory expectations.

Data-flow and lifecycle maps

Visual models of how critical GxP data is created, processed, transferred, stored and archived across systems.  

Risk and gap register

Gaps categorised by patient safety, product quality and data-integrity impact, with proposed priorities.  

Control and role model

Definition of controls, roles (including Data Owners) and responsibilities at key lifecycle stages.  

Remediation roadmap

Sequenced actions spanning configuration changes, procedure updates, training and (re)validation where required.  

Training materials

Tailored slide decks, exercises and examples that use your systems and records.  

Three colleagues collaborating and looking at a laptop screen in a bright office with large windows.

These deliverables are designed to be reused across future projects and audits, not just for a single assessment.

Outcomes You Can Expect

Stronger inspection and audit readiness

A clearer narrative and evidence base across GxP systems, aligned with ALCOA+ and data-lifecycle expectations.

Clear ownership and accountability for GxP data

Roles and responsibilities defined across Quality, IT and the business.

Consistent ALCOA+ controls

Harmonised expectations and patterns across systems and sites, reducing “weak link” risks.

Better linkage between processes, validation and operations

Validation work that reflects real usage and data flows, not just idealised processes.

Reduced rework and fire-fighting

Fewer surprises during audits, upgrades and system changes, and less need for urgent remediation projects.

When to Consider Portfolio Excellence

You need a structured GxP data-integrity assessment across one or more systems

You are planning or executing a CSV / CSA project and want to build data integrity in from day one

You have received data-integrity observations from an inspection or internal audit

You are upgrading, migrating or consolidating systems and want to protect data integrity during the transition

You are introducing more automation, cloud or SaaS and need to understand how ALCOA+ applies in that context

Woman presenting data charts on a flip chart to two colleagues in a modern office.

Why Amalia

We help organisations turn complex change into solutions that people actually use. We combine structure, respect and creativity so your teams deliver better outcomes with less friction. Here is what that looks like in real engagements.

Simplicity by design — no unnecessary complexity

We remove what isn’t needed while keeping essential controls and compliance. The result is clear, practical systems that are easy to adopt and maintain.

One integrated team instead of new silos

A single, senior, cross-functional team replaces multiple vendors. Fewer hand-offs, faster delivery, and one accountable partner throughout.

Portfolio governance model

We align leadership, QA, IT and operations around shared decisions. Clear reasoning, documented outcomes, and no misalignment.

Process-first, risk-based delivery

Solutions are built around real processes and real risk. Practical delivery that avoids shelfware and drives measurable outcomes.

Global experience, tailored to your context

We bring global experience and adapt it to your specific context and operating reality. Proven frameworks, applied flexibly where they matter most.

It is personal for us

Senior leaders stay involved from start to finish on every engagement. Each programme is treated as a long-term partnership, not a one-off project.

Want to simplify complex work without losing control?

Work with a team that can join up governance, assurance, platforms and technical depth from start to finish.

Privacy Policy Cookie Policy